Comparison

Sound and Video Rentals vs Desired Effect

Across conference AV in San Francisco, Sound and Video Rentals scores 55 and Desired Effect scores 36 on our published rubric, placing them 5 and 12 of 12. Sound and Video Rentals leads on rating quality, review depth, service depth and operational proof. Desired Effect leads on none.

All figures verified 2026-08-01.

Sound and Video Rentals and Desired Effect, side by side

CheckedSound and Video RentalsDesired Effect
Google rating5.0 (42 reviews)4.8 (23 reviews)
Ratings below four stars01
Published services210
Google categories109
Publishes a pricenono
Address712 Bancroft Rd, Walnut Creek, CA 945981948 Oak Park Blvd, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Years in businessnot verifiednot verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both columns

How Sound and Video Rentals and Desired Effect score on each rubric dimension

Scored inside the conference AV category, where both appear, using that category’s published weights. A dimension neither vendor could be scored on is marked rather than guessed.

DimensionWeightSound and Video RentalsDesired Effect
Rating quality2510092
Review depth203619
Service depth25430
Price transparency1500
Operational proof158060
Total1005536

Review records for Sound and Video Rentals and Desired Effect

The distribution matters more than the average. A high mean can hide a tail of unhappy customers, and a small clean record is a different thing from a large mixed one.

Sound and Video Rentals

5.0 across 42 reviews, checked 2026-08-01

Desired Effect

4.8 across 23 reviews, checked 2026-08-01

Where Sound and Video Rentals and Desired Effect both rank

Full profiles

Sources

  • Google Business Profile, checked 2026-08-01: rating, rating distribution, 21 published services across 10 categories, profile attributes and photo count.
  • Google Business Profile, checked 2026-08-01: rating, rating distribution, 0 published services across 9 categories, profile attributes and photo count.
  • Scores are computed from the rubric published at /rubric, using the same weights and the same cohort as the ranking page they appear on. Nothing on this page is estimated.