Comparison

Luma Creative vs LV Productions

Across video production in San Francisco, Luma Creative scores 98 and LV Productions scores 68 on our published rubric, placing them 1 and 3 of 14. Luma Creative leads on review depth, service depth and operational proof. LV Productions leads on none.

All figures verified 2026-08-01.

Luma Creative and LV Productions, side by side

CheckedLuma CreativeLV Productions
Google rating5.0 (98 reviews)5.0 (62 reviews)
Ratings below four stars00
Published services24454
Google categories53
Publishes a priceFrom $2,500 (Live Event Streaming)From $2,000 (Aerial videography)
Address548 Market St #87563, San Francisco, CA 94104415 Jackson St, San Francisco, CA 94111, United States
Years in business15+ years, per its Google listingnot verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both columns

How Luma Creative and LV Productions score on each rubric dimension

Scored inside the video production category, where both appear, using that category’s published weights. A dimension neither vendor could be scored on is marked rather than guessed.

DimensionWeightLuma CreativeLV Productions
Rating quality25100100
Review depth2510063
Service depth259220
Price transparency10100100
Operational proof1510080
Total1009868

Review records for Luma Creative and LV Productions

The distribution matters more than the average. A high mean can hide a tail of unhappy customers, and a small clean record is a different thing from a large mixed one.

Luma Creative

5.0 across 98 reviews, checked 2026-08-01

LV Productions

5.0 across 62 reviews, checked 2026-08-01

Where Luma Creative and LV Productions both rank

Full profiles

Sources

  • Google Business Profile, checked 2026-08-01: rating, rating distribution, 244 published services across 5 categories, profile attributes and photo count.
  • Google Business Profile, checked 2026-08-01: rating, rating distribution, 54 published services across 3 categories, profile attributes and photo count.
  • Scores are computed from the rubric published at /rubric, using the same weights and the same cohort as the ranking page they appear on. Nothing on this page is estimated.