Comparison

Luma Creative vs Kasey Bruce Media

Across video production in San Francisco, Luma Creative scores 98 and Kasey Bruce Media scores 55 on our published rubric, placing them 1 and 8 of 14. Luma Creative leads on review depth, service depth, price transparency and operational proof. Kasey Bruce Media leads on none.

All figures verified 2026-08-01.

Luma Creative and Kasey Bruce Media, side by side

CheckedLuma CreativeKasey Bruce Media
Google rating5.0 (98 reviews)5.0 (66 reviews)
Ratings below four stars00
Published services2447
Google categories55
Publishes a priceFrom $2,500 (Live Event Streaming)no
Address548 Market St #87563, San Francisco, CA 941042001 Fillmore St #2, San Francisco, CA 94115
Years in business15+ years, per its Google listingnot verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both columns

How Luma Creative and Kasey Bruce Media score on each rubric dimension

Scored inside the video production category, where both appear, using that category’s published weights. A dimension neither vendor could be scored on is marked rather than guessed.

DimensionWeightLuma CreativeKasey Bruce Media
Rating quality25100100
Review depth2510067
Service depth25923
Price transparency101000
Operational proof1510080
Total1009855

Review records for Luma Creative and Kasey Bruce Media

The distribution matters more than the average. A high mean can hide a tail of unhappy customers, and a small clean record is a different thing from a large mixed one.

Luma Creative

5.0 across 98 reviews, checked 2026-08-01

Kasey Bruce Media

5.0 across 66 reviews, checked 2026-08-01

Where Luma Creative and Kasey Bruce Media both rank

Full profiles

Sources

  • Google Business Profile, checked 2026-08-01: rating, rating distribution, 244 published services across 5 categories, profile attributes and photo count.
  • Google Business Profile, checked 2026-08-01: rating, rating distribution, 7 published services across 5 categories, profile attributes and photo count.
  • Scores are computed from the rubric published at /rubric, using the same weights and the same cohort as the ranking page they appear on. Nothing on this page is estimated.